Pick one group.
Beginner builder, busy operator, creator/consultant, or another Tim-approved audience. Keep it small enough to review manually.
Command brief
Path A is not a campaign. It is a tiny human learning test.
Use this packet only after Tim chooses manual validation on the launch approval card. The goal is to learn where the Start Here pack is confusing, useful, objectionable, or worth a next step before StackPilot opens email capture, checkout, analytics, deployment, ads, accounts, or outreach automation.
draft-only / no launch systemsApproved-message packet
The message Tim edits before sharing manually.
Hey — I am testing a small Start Here worksheet pack for people who want to build an AI-assisted one-person business without jumping straight into random tools.
The route is: buyer → pain → offer → stack → agents → content → customers → delivery.
Would you be willing to look at the route and tell me where it gets confusing, what feels useful, and whether you would actually use the 7-day worksheet sequence? No signup or purchase — I am trying to find the weak spots before building anything public.
Choose what they see.
Manual router, sample artifacts, 7-day pack page, printable pack, or a short screenshot — only if Tim approves the exact asset.
Ask for friction.
What confused you? What feels useful? What would stop you? Would you use Day 01? What proof would you need?
Before any manual share
All approval fields must be true.
Audience approvedTim names the person type, channel, and whether any individual recipient is allowed.
Wording approvedTim edits the script into his voice before any manual share.
Asset approvedThe exact Start Here page/file/screenshot allowed for review is named.
No launch systemsNo email provider, checkout, analytics, deployment, ad, public post, CRM, account setup, or automation.
Feedback rules approvedReplies are recorded with pseudonyms/initials only; no private screenshots, phone numbers, emails, customer data, or confidential details.
Stop rule approvedAfter five useful responses, pause and use the response synthesis plus decision review before opening any bigger system.
Stop rules
Pause and improve before launch systems if any of these show up.
They cannot repeat the route.
If the buyer → offer → stack sequence is unclear, improve the Start Here explanation.
Day 01 feels too hard.
If the first buyer map feels vague, add simpler examples before adding capture or checkout.
No useful signal.
If people say “cool” but ask no questions and request nothing, share manually again or improve the ask.
They want a different product.
If responses cluster around another pain, update positioning before building systems.
Proof feels missing.
If people do not trust the pack, add safer samples, QA proof, or clearer boundaries before launch.
They think AI sends or automates.
If safety is misunderstood, strengthen human approval gates before showing the pack again.
First-five flow
The next decision is conservative by default.
01 logRecord each reply in the manual feedback log with pseudonyms only.
02 countUse response synthesis to count clarity, confusion, objection, and demand patterns.
03 choosePick WAIT, IMPROVE, MANUAL SHARE AGAIN, FREE LEAD MAGNET, or PAID PRODUCT.
04 approveTim approves any next external system before Hermes touches it.
05 act locallyHermes may update local copy, samples, worksheets, ZIP, and QA based on supplied feedback.