Keep
One central CRM, tracker, or spreadsheet that the team will actually update every day.
Sample deliverable / proof preview
This is a fictional sample, not a client case study. It shows the kind of scorecard, leak diagnosis, workflow map, and cleanup plan a buyer receives so the offer is concrete before anyone asks for account access or pays for software.
Trust note: No fake customer names, fake screenshots, fake revenue claims, or fake testimonials are used here. This sample is a modeled deliverable for a common scattered-follow-up workflow.
The business is not ready for a heavy automation build. The first fix is pipeline visibility: one owner, one status, one next action, and one weekly review.
Executive scorecard
| Area | Sample finding | Risk level | First fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead capture | Forms are captured, but phone/referral/DM leads are manually typed later. | High | Create one intake log for every lead source before choosing more tools. |
| Speed to response | Hot inquiries get fast replies when noticed; low-visibility sources can wait 1-3 days. | High | Set a same-day response rule and daily lead inbox sweep. |
| Status clarity | Quoted, waiting, follow-up, and lost are not separated consistently. | Medium | Use five plain-English statuses that every lead must occupy. |
| Next action | Many records have notes but no next date or owner. | High | Require owner + next action + next date before a lead leaves review. |
| Reporting | The owner can count new leads, but not stalled quotes or overdue follow-ups. | Medium | Add a weekly stalled-lead review by source and stage. |
Top 3 leaks
Recommendation
First create a reliable manual control point. Automation should come after the statuses, handoff rules, and next-action rhythm are visible and repeatable.
Before / after workflow map
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| Phone call, form, DM, and referral leads land in different places. | Every source is copied or routed into one lead intake view by the end of each day. |
| Notes describe conversations, but do not always define the next step. | Every active lead has one owner, one status, one next action, and one next date. |
| Quotes are followed up when remembered. | Quotes older than 2 business days show in an overdue follow-up view. |
| The owner asks, “What happened with that lead?” | The weekly review answers: new, active, stalled, won, lost, and no-response by source. |
One central CRM, tracker, or spreadsheet that the team will actually update every day.
Duplicate side lists, unowned inbox labels, and “I will remember” follow-up habits.
Form-to-CRM, missed-call text-back, and quote follow-up automation after the manual loop is stable.
7-day cleanup plan
| Day | Action | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | List every lead source and where it lands. | Lead-source map. |
| 2 | Create five statuses: New, Contacted, Quoted, Follow-up due, Closed/Lost. | Plain-English pipeline. |
| 3 | Audit 20 recent leads for missing owner, status, or next date. | Leak count by field. |
| 4 | Build an overdue-follow-up view. | Daily callback list. |
| 5 | Write a same-day response rule and quote follow-up rule. | Follow-up standard. |
| 6 | Review stalled leads and pick three save attempts. | Recovery list. |
| 7 | Run the first weekly review: source, stage, owner, next action. | Repeatable owner dashboard. |
Use this sample to self-qualify
The Starter audit is meant to find the first practical leak, not sell a heavy implementation. Growth and Cleanup Sprint packages make sense only when multiple lead sources, owners, or stalled quotes are involved.
Keep the checklist
Get the free AI business checklist now. Later you get a short note only when a guide changes or a new kit ships. One email to [email protected] unsubscribes you.