Keep
One central CRM, tracker, or spreadsheet that the team will actually update every day.
Sample deliverable / proof preview
This is a fictional sample, not a client case study. It shows the kind of scorecard, leak diagnosis, workflow map, and cleanup plan a buyer receives so the offer is concrete before anyone asks for account access or pays for software.
Trust note: No fake customer names, fake screenshots, fake revenue claims, or fake testimonials are used here. This sample is a modeled deliverable for a common scattered-follow-up workflow.
The business is not ready for a heavy automation build. The first fix is pipeline visibility: one owner, one status, one next action, and one weekly review.
Executive scorecard
| Area | Sample finding | Risk level | First fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead capture | Forms are captured, but phone/referral/DM leads are manually typed later. | High | Create one intake log for every lead source before choosing more tools. |
| Speed to response | Hot inquiries get fast replies when noticed; low-visibility sources can wait 1-3 days. | High | Set a same-day response rule and daily lead inbox sweep. |
| Status clarity | Quoted, waiting, follow-up, and lost are not separated consistently. | Medium | Use five plain-English statuses that every lead must occupy. |
| Next action | Many records have notes but no next date or owner. | High | Require owner + next action + next date before a lead leaves review. |
| Reporting | The owner can count new leads, but not stalled quotes or overdue follow-ups. | Medium | Add a weekly stalled-lead review by source and stage. |
Top 3 leaks
Recommendation
First create a reliable manual control point. Automation should come after the statuses, handoff rules, and next-action rhythm are visible and repeatable.
Before / after workflow map
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| Phone call, form, DM, and referral leads land in different places. | Every source is copied or routed into one lead intake view by the end of each day. |
| Notes describe conversations, but do not always define the next step. | Every active lead has one owner, one status, one next action, and one next date. |
| Quotes are followed up when remembered. | Quotes older than 2 business days show in an overdue follow-up view. |
| The owner asks, “What happened with that lead?” | The weekly review answers: new, active, stalled, won, lost, and no-response by source. |
One central CRM, tracker, or spreadsheet that the team will actually update every day.
Duplicate side lists, unowned inbox labels, and “I will remember” follow-up habits.
Form-to-CRM, missed-call text-back, and quote follow-up automation after the manual loop is stable.
7-day cleanup plan
| Day | Action | Output |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | List every lead source and where it lands. | Lead-source map. |
| 2 | Create five statuses: New, Contacted, Quoted, Follow-up due, Closed/Lost. | Plain-English pipeline. |
| 3 | Audit 20 recent leads for missing owner, status, or next date. | Leak count by field. |
| 4 | Build an overdue-follow-up view. | Daily callback list. |
| 5 | Write a same-day response rule and quote follow-up rule. | Follow-up standard. |
| 6 | Review stalled leads and pick three save attempts. | Recovery list. |
| 7 | Run the first weekly review: source, stage, owner, next action. | Repeatable owner dashboard. |
Use this sample to self-qualify
The Starter audit is meant to find the first practical leak, not sell a heavy implementation. Growth and Cleanup Sprint packages make sense only when multiple lead sources, owners, or stalled quotes are involved.